Choosing between Unchained and Firefish requires evaluating total cost, custody risk, and which platform aligns with your borrowing profile. Unchained uses collaborative multisig (2-of-3) with 14%–15% APR, while Firefish uses non-custodial escrow (3-of-3 pre-signed transactions) with ≈7%–13% (P2P) APR.
On a $500,000 loan, Firefish costs $62,000 in the first year versus $80,000 at Unchained, a difference of $18,000. Part of Unchained's higher cost comes from its 2% origination fee, which adds $10,000 upfront on this loan size.
The custody difference is material. Firefish uses non-custodial escrow (3-of-3 pre-signed transactions), which means your Bitcoin requires multiple key holders to coordinate, reducing single-point-of-failure risk. Unchained uses collaborative multisig (2-of-3). In a platform insolvency scenario, Firefish borrowers' collateral is protected by the multisig architecture, while Unchained borrowers may face creditor claims.
Unchained is the better fit for borrowers who are borrowing $150,000 or more and want collaborative key control. Firefish is the better fit for borrowers who need smaller loans or more flexible access.
Key details to be aware of: Unchained: Commercial/institutional borrowers only since Jan 2024 — no consumer loans. Uses CTP ratio (inverse of LTV). Firefish: European P2P marketplace (EUR, CZK, CHF, PLN fiat + USDC) — rates set by investor supply and demand, typically ~7-13% (advertised 'from 5%'). 1.