Choosing between Strike and Lava requires evaluating total cost, custody risk, and which platform aligns with your borrowing profile. Strike uses custodial (proof-of-reserves for 50+ BTC) with 7.49%–10.5% APR, while Lava uses distributed-key custody (institutional custodians) with 6.5%–7.5% APR.
On the standardized $250,000, 50% LTV, 12-month scenario, Lava costs $21,788 in the first year versus $25,000 at Strike, a difference of $3,212.
Both platforms use similar custody approaches. Strike operates via custodial (proof-of-reserves for 50+ BTC), and Lava uses distributed-key custody (institutional custodians). Neither platform rehypothecates borrower collateral.
Strike is the better fit for borrowers who are borrowing $10,000 or more and are comfortable with custodial lending. Lava is the better fit for borrowers who need smaller loans or more flexible access.
Key details to be aware of: Strike: 0.79% fee if repaying with BTC collateral, 0. Lava: The headline rate excludes Lava's 2% annual capital charge, applied to the year's largest outstanding balance — and unlike a one-time origination fee, it recurs every year the line stays open. Interest compounds daily into the balance; the current-year capital charge does not itself accrue interest.