Choosing between Strike and Firefish requires evaluating total cost, custody risk, and which platform aligns with your borrowing profile. Strike uses custodial with 7.49%–10.5% APR, while Firefish uses non-custodial escrow (3-of-3 pre-signed transactions) with ≈7%–13% (P2P) APR.
On a $250,000 loan, Strike costs $25,000 in the first year versus $31,000 at Firefish, a difference of $6,000. Part of Firefish's higher cost comes from its 1.5% origination fee, which adds $3,750 upfront on this loan size. Strike charges no origination fee, so the only cost is interest.
The custody difference is material. Firefish uses non-custodial escrow (3-of-3 pre-signed transactions), which means your Bitcoin requires multiple key holders to coordinate, reducing single-point-of-failure risk. Strike uses custodial. In a platform insolvency scenario, Firefish borrowers' collateral is protected by the multisig architecture, while Strike borrowers may face creditor claims.
Strike is the better fit for borrowers who are borrowing $10,000 or more and are comfortable with custodial lending. Firefish is the better fit for borrowers who need smaller loans or more flexible access.
Key details to be aware of: Strike: Monthly-payment interest rates shown (10.5% = 11. Firefish: European P2P marketplace (EUR, CZK, CHF, PLN fiat + USDC) — rates set by investor supply and demand, typically ~7-13% (advertised 'from 5%'). 1.