Choosing between SALT and Firefish requires evaluating total cost, custody risk, and which platform aligns with your borrowing profile. SALT uses custodial with 9.95%–14.45% APR, while Firefish uses non-custodial escrow (3-of-3 pre-signed transactions) with ≈7%–13% (P2P) APR.
On a $250,000 loan, SALT costs $29,875 in the first year versus $31,000 at Firefish, a difference of $1,125. Part of Firefish's higher cost comes from its 1.5% origination fee, which adds $3,750 upfront on this loan size.
The custody difference is material. Firefish uses non-custodial escrow (3-of-3 pre-signed transactions), which means your Bitcoin requires multiple key holders to coordinate, reducing single-point-of-failure risk. SALT uses custodial. In a platform insolvency scenario, Firefish borrowers' collateral is protected by the multisig architecture, while SALT borrowers may face creditor claims.
SALT is the better fit for borrowers who need smaller loans or instant access. Firefish is the better fit for borrowers who need smaller loans or more flexible access.
Key details to be aware of: SALT: Rates vary by LTV x term matrix (1/3/5-yr terms; 1-yr shown — longer terms cost up to 3% more). 1% origination fee. Firefish: European P2P marketplace (EUR, CZK, CHF, PLN fiat + USDC) — rates set by investor supply and demand, typically ~7-13% (advertised 'from 5%'). 1.