Choosing between SALT and Aave requires evaluating total cost, custody risk, and which platform aligns with your borrowing profile. SALT uses custodial with 9.95%–14.45% APR, while Aave uses smart contract (wrapped btc via custodial bridge) with ~4.4% (variable) APR.
On a $250,000 loan, Aave costs $11,000 in the first year versus $29,875 at SALT, a difference of $18,875. Part of SALT's higher cost comes from its 1% origination fee, which adds $2,500 upfront on this loan size. Aave charges no origination fee, so the only cost is interest.
The custody difference is material. Aave uses smart contract (wrapped btc via custodial bridge), which means your Bitcoin requires multiple key holders to coordinate, reducing single-point-of-failure risk. SALT uses custodial. In a platform insolvency scenario, Aave borrowers' collateral is protected by the multisig architecture, while SALT borrowers may face creditor claims.
SALT is the better fit for borrowers who need smaller loans or instant access. Aave is the better fit for borrowers who need smaller loans or more flexible access.
Key details to be aware of: SALT: Rates vary by LTV x term matrix (1/3/5-yr terms; 1-yr shown — longer terms cost up to 3% more). 1% origination fee. Aave: DeFi money market — rates are variable and utilization-driven: USDC borrow against WBTC/cbBTC has ranged ~3.5-5.