Bitcoin Loan Comparison

Figure vs. Aave

Figure charges 8.91%–11.5% APR with a 1% origination fee using custodial (figure markets mpc wallet, segregated). Aave charges ~4.4% (variable) APR with $0 origination fees using smart contract (wrapped btc via custodial bridge). See the full breakdown of rates, thresholds, and custody risk below.

Rates verified 2026-06-09

How do Figure and Aave compare for Bitcoin-backed loans?

Aave advertises a lower headline rate at ~4.4% (variable) compared to Figure's 8.91%–11.5%. On a $1M loan held for 12 months, Aave saves $55,100 in total first-year cost (interest plus origination fees). From a custody perspective, Aave presents lower counterparty risk with its smart contract (wrapped btc via custodial bridge) model.

Figure vs. Aave: Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Figure
Aave
Interest Rate (APR)
8.91%–11.5%
~4.4% (variable)Aave
Origination Fee
1%
$0Aave
Max Starting LTV
75%Figure
73%
Margin Call Threshold
70% LTVFigure
None — liquidation at 78% LTV
Liquidation Threshold
85% LTVFigure
78% LTV
Margin Call Window
24 hoursFigure
None — automated liquidation
Custody Model
Custodial (Figure Markets MPC wallet, segregated)
Smart contract (wrapped BTC via custodial bridge)Aave
Rehypothecation
No
No
Interest Payment
Monthly
Capitalized
Minimum Loan
$5,000
No minimumAave

APR by Loan Size: Figure vs. Aave

Figure structures rates by LTV ratio rather than loan amount, so the rate depends on how much collateral you pledge relative to the loan. Total year-1 cost includes both annualized interest and any origination fees charged upfront.

Loan SizeFigure APRAave APRFigure Total Year-1 CostAave Total Year-1 CostSavings
$100,0008.91%4.4%$9,910$4,400$5,510 with Aave
$250,0008.91%4.4%$24,775$11,000$13,775 with Aave
$500,0008.91%4.4%$49,550$22,000$27,550 with Aave
$1M8.91%4.4%$99,100$44,000$55,100 with Aave
$5M8.91%4.4%$495,500$220,000$275,500 with Aave

Total year-1 cost includes annualized interest plus origination fees. Figure: 1% origination fee. Aave rates are variable; the table uses a representative recent rate. Rates sourced from each lender's public rate pages as of 2026-06-09.

Custody and Collateral Security

Figure and Aave take fundamentally different approaches to collateral custody. Figure uses Custodial (Figure Markets MPC wallet, segregated). Your Bitcoin is held by Figure and could be at risk in the event of a hack, insolvency, or regulatory action. Aave holds collateral in audited smart contracts rather than with a single lender, but borrowing requires wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC or cbBTC) — your underlying BTC is held by the wrapper's custodian (BitGo/BiT Global for WBTC, Coinbase for cbBTC), reintroducing custodial bridge risk. Smart-contract and oracle risk also apply.

Figure: High (Custodial)
  • Custodial (Figure Markets MPC wallet, segregated)
  • Rehypothecation: No
  • Monthly interest payments
  • 8.
Aave: Medium (Smart Contract + Bridge)
  • Smart contract (wrapped BTC via custodial bridge)
  • Rehypothecation: No
  • Interest capitalized (compounding)
  • DeFi money market — rates are variable and utilization-driven: USDC borrow against WBTC/cbBTC has ranged ~3.

Margin Call and Liquidation: Figure vs. Aave

Figure triggers margin calls at 70% LTV and liquidates at 85% LTV. Aave has no margin-call mechanism: positions become liquidatable automatically the moment LTV crosses 78%, with no warning threshold or response window. Figure gives borrowers 24 hours to respond to a margin call before any collateral is sold.

ThresholdFigureAave
Max Starting LTV75%73%
Margin Call70% LTVNone
Margin Call Window24 hoursNone — automated liquidation
Liquidation85% LTV78% LTV

Safety Buffer Comparison

Figure: 10.0 percentage point buffer between starting LTV (75%) and liquidation (85%). Aave: 5.0 percentage point buffer between starting LTV (73%) and liquidation (78%). Figure provides a wider safety margin.

Which is better: Figure or Aave?

Choosing between Figure and Aave requires evaluating total cost, custody risk, and which platform aligns with your borrowing profile. Figure uses custodial (figure markets mpc wallet, segregated) with 8.91%–11.5% APR, while Aave uses smart contract (wrapped btc via custodial bridge) with ~4.4% (variable) APR.

On a $250,000 loan, Aave costs $11,000 in the first year versus $24,775 at Figure, a difference of $13,775. Part of Figure's higher cost comes from its 1% origination fee, which adds $2,500 upfront on this loan size. Aave charges no origination fee, so the only cost is interest.

The custody difference is material. Aave uses smart contract (wrapped btc via custodial bridge), which means your Bitcoin requires multiple key holders to coordinate, reducing single-point-of-failure risk. Figure uses custodial (figure markets mpc wallet, segregated). In a platform insolvency scenario, Aave borrowers' collateral is protected by the multisig architecture, while Figure borrowers may face creditor claims.

Figure is the better fit for borrowers who need smaller loans or instant access. Aave is the better fit for borrowers who need smaller loans or more flexible access.

Key details to be aware of: Figure: 8.91% interest (9. Aave: DeFi money market — rates are variable and utilization-driven: USDC borrow against WBTC/cbBTC has ranged ~3.5-5.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Figure or Aave cheaper for a $500,000 Bitcoin-backed loan?

Aave is cheaper. On a $500,000 loan held for 12 months, Figure costs $49,550 (8.91% APR + 1% origination fee) while Aave costs $22,000 (4.4% APR). That is a $27,550 difference in the first year.

How does Figure's custody model compare to Aave?

Figure uses custodial (figure markets mpc wallet, segregated). Aave uses smart contract (wrapped btc via custodial bridge). Aave presents lower custody risk because your collateral requires coordination among multiple key holders.

What is the minimum loan amount at Figure vs Aave?

Figure's minimum loan is $5,000. Aave has no minimum. Aave is more accessible for smaller borrowers.

What happens if Bitcoin drops while I have a loan with Figure or Aave?

Figure issues a margin call at 70% LTV with a 24-hour response window and liquidates at 85% LTV. Aave has no margin call — positions are liquidated automatically the moment LTV crosses 78%. Starting from a 50% LTV, Figure provides a 35-point buffer before liquidation, while Aave provides a 28-point buffer.

Should I use Figure or Aave for a Bitcoin-backed loan?

It depends on your priorities. Figure (8.91%–11.5% APR, custodial (figure markets mpc wallet, segregated), min $5,000) is better for borrowers who value custodial (figure markets mpc wallet, segregated) and need smaller loan access. Aave (~4.4% (variable) APR, smart contract (wrapped btc via custodial bridge), no minimum) is better for borrowers who value smart contract (wrapped btc via custodial bridge) and need smaller loan access. Use the rate table and cost comparison above to model your specific scenario.

Other comparisons

Looking for a non-custodial alternative?

Lygos offers 10% APR, $0 origination fees, and DLC-secured collateral where rehypothecation is cryptographically impossible.

Figure vs Aave: Bitcoin Loan Comparison | Lygos