Choosing between Figure and Aave requires evaluating total cost, custody risk, and which platform aligns with your borrowing profile. Figure uses custodial (figure markets mpc wallet, segregated) with 8.91%–11.5% APR, while Aave uses smart contract (wrapped btc via custodial bridge) with ~4.4% (variable) APR.
On a $250,000 loan, Aave costs $11,000 in the first year versus $24,775 at Figure, a difference of $13,775. Part of Figure's higher cost comes from its 1% origination fee, which adds $2,500 upfront on this loan size. Aave charges no origination fee, so the only cost is interest.
The custody difference is material. Aave uses smart contract (wrapped btc via custodial bridge), which means your Bitcoin requires multiple key holders to coordinate, reducing single-point-of-failure risk. Figure uses custodial (figure markets mpc wallet, segregated). In a platform insolvency scenario, Aave borrowers' collateral is protected by the multisig architecture, while Figure borrowers may face creditor claims.
Figure is the better fit for borrowers who need smaller loans or instant access. Aave is the better fit for borrowers who need smaller loans or more flexible access.
Key details to be aware of: Figure: 8.91% interest (9. Aave: DeFi money market — rates are variable and utilization-driven: USDC borrow against WBTC/cbBTC has ranged ~3.5-5.