Bitcoin Loan Comparison

Arch vs. Firefish

Arch charges 7.75%–9% APR with a 1.49% origination fee using custodial (anchorage, qualified custodian). Firefish charges ≈7%–13% (P2P) APR with a 1.5% origination fee using non-custodial escrow (3-of-3 pre-signed transactions). See the full breakdown of rates, thresholds, and custody risk below.

Rates verified 2026-06-09

How do Arch and Firefish compare for Bitcoin-backed loans?

Arch offers a lower headline rate at 7.75%–9% compared to Firefish's ≈7%–13% (P2P). On a $1M loan held for 12 months, Arch saves $29,100 in total first-year cost (interest plus origination fees). From a custody perspective, Firefish presents lower counterparty risk with its non-custodial escrow (3-of-3 pre-signed transactions) model.

Arch vs. Firefish: Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Arch
Firefish
Interest Rate (APR)
7.75%–9%Arch
≈7%–13% (P2P)
Origination Fee
1.49%Arch
1.5%
Max Starting LTV
60%Arch
50%
Margin Call Threshold
70% LTV
73% LTVFirefish
Liquidation Threshold
80% LTV
95% LTVFirefish
Margin Call Window
24 hoursArch
Threshold-based
Custody Model
Custodial (Anchorage, qualified custodian)
Non-custodial escrow (3-of-3 pre-signed transactions)Firefish
Rehypothecation
No
No
Interest Payment
Monthly
At maturity
Minimum Loan
$5,000
$1,000Firefish

APR by Loan Size: Arch vs. Firefish

Arch offers tiered rates that decrease with larger loan amounts, while Firefish charges a flat rate regardless of loan size. Total year-1 cost includes both annualized interest and any origination fees charged upfront.

Loan SizeArch APRFirefish APRArch Total Year-1 CostFirefish Total Year-1 CostSavings
$100,0009%10.9%$10,490$12,400$1,910 with Arch
$250,0008.5%10.9%$24,975$31,000$6,025 with Arch
$500,0008.5%10.9%$49,950$62,000$12,050 with Arch
$1M8%10.9%$94,900$124,000$29,100 with Arch
$5M7.75%10.9%$462,000$620,000$158,000 with Arch

Total year-1 cost includes annualized interest plus origination fees. Arch: 1.49% origination fee. Firefish: 1.5% origination fee. Firefish rates are set by the lending marketplace; the table uses a representative recent rate. Rates sourced from each lender's public rate pages as of 2026-06-09.

Custody and Collateral Security

Arch and Firefish take fundamentally different approaches to collateral custody. Arch uses Custodial (Anchorage, qualified custodian). Your Bitcoin is held by Arch and could be at risk in the event of a hack, insolvency, or regulatory action. Firefish uses Non-custodial escrow (3-of-3 pre-signed transactions). Your Bitcoin is locked on the Bitcoin blockchain in a smart contract. Neither Firefish nor any third party can access or move your collateral.

Arch: High (Custodial)
  • Custodial (Anchorage, qualified custodian)
  • Rehypothecation: No
  • Monthly interest payments
  • Origination fee is tiered and falls with loan size: 1.
Firefish: Low (Non-Custodial)
  • Non-custodial escrow (3-of-3 pre-signed transactions)
  • Rehypothecation: No
  • At-maturity interest payments
  • European P2P marketplace (EUR, CZK, CHF, PLN fiat + USDC) — rates set by investor supply and demand, typically ~7-13% (advertised 'from 5%').

Margin Call and Liquidation: Arch vs. Firefish

Arch triggers margin calls at 70% LTV and liquidates at 80% LTV. Firefish triggers margin calls at 73% LTV and liquidates at 95% LTV. Arch gives borrowers 24 hours to respond to a margin call. Firefish uses threshold-based triggers without a fixed response window.

ThresholdArchFirefish
Max Starting LTV60%50%
Margin Call70% LTV73% LTV
Margin Call Window24 hoursThreshold-based
Liquidation80% LTV95% LTV

Safety Buffer Comparison

Arch: 20.0 percentage point buffer between starting LTV (60%) and liquidation (80%). Firefish: 45.0 percentage point buffer between starting LTV (50%) and liquidation (95%). Firefish provides a wider safety margin.

Which is better: Arch or Firefish?

Choosing between Arch and Firefish requires evaluating total cost, custody risk, and which platform aligns with your borrowing profile. Arch uses custodial (anchorage, qualified custodian) with 7.75%–9% APR, while Firefish uses non-custodial escrow (3-of-3 pre-signed transactions) with ≈7%–13% (P2P) APR.

On a $250,000 loan, Arch costs $24,975 in the first year versus $31,000 at Firefish, a difference of $6,025. Part of Firefish's higher cost comes from its 1.5% origination fee, which adds $3,750 upfront on this loan size.

The custody difference is material. Firefish uses non-custodial escrow (3-of-3 pre-signed transactions), which means your Bitcoin requires multiple key holders to coordinate, reducing single-point-of-failure risk. Arch uses custodial (anchorage, qualified custodian). In a platform insolvency scenario, Firefish borrowers' collateral is protected by the multisig architecture, while Arch borrowers may face creditor claims.

Arch is the better fit for borrowers who need smaller loans or instant access. Firefish is the better fit for borrowers who need smaller loans or more flexible access.

Key details to be aware of: Arch: Origination fee is tiered and falls with loan size: 1.49% below $750K, 0. Firefish: European P2P marketplace (EUR, CZK, CHF, PLN fiat + USDC) — rates set by investor supply and demand, typically ~7-13% (advertised 'from 5%'). 1.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Arch or Firefish cheaper for a $500,000 Bitcoin-backed loan?

Arch is cheaper. On a $500,000 loan held for 12 months, Arch costs $49,950 (8.5% APR + 1.49% origination fee) while Firefish costs $62,000 (10.9% APR + 1.5% origination fee). That is a $12,050 difference in the first year.

How does Arch's custody model compare to Firefish?

Arch uses custodial (anchorage, qualified custodian). Firefish uses non-custodial escrow (3-of-3 pre-signed transactions). Firefish presents lower custody risk because your collateral requires coordination among multiple key holders.

What is the minimum loan amount at Arch vs Firefish?

Arch's minimum loan is $5,000. Firefish's minimum is $1,000. Firefish is more accessible for smaller borrowers.

What happens if Bitcoin drops while I have a loan with Arch or Firefish?

Arch issues a margin call at 70% LTV with a 24-hour response window and liquidates at 80% LTV. Firefish issues a margin call at 73% LTV (threshold-based, no fixed window) and liquidates at 95% LTV. Starting from a 50% LTV, Arch provides a 30-point buffer before liquidation, while Firefish provides a 45-point buffer.

Should I use Arch or Firefish for a Bitcoin-backed loan?

It depends on your priorities. Arch (7.75%–9% APR, custodial (anchorage, qualified custodian), min $5,000) is better for borrowers who value custodial (anchorage, qualified custodian) and need smaller loan access. Firefish (≈7%–13% (P2P) APR, non-custodial escrow (3-of-3 pre-signed transactions), min $1,000) is better for borrowers who value non-custodial escrow (3-of-3 pre-signed transactions) and need smaller loan access. Use the rate table and cost comparison above to model your specific scenario.

Other comparisons

Looking for a non-custodial alternative?

Lygos offers 10% APR, $0 origination fees, and DLC-secured collateral where rehypothecation is cryptographically impossible.

Arch vs Firefish: Bitcoin Loan Comparison | Lygos